KING TIGER
KING TIGER

TIGER II
Panzerkampfwagen Tiger Ausf. B


The clash of armour on the eastern front created an arms race of armour between Germany and Russia that sparked a rapid evolution in tank design. Since the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941 until the collapse of Germany in 1945 each side competed to put the best machine on the battlefield. German AFVs put to the challenge of defeating Russia in 1941 had as thin as 13mm of armour to a maximum of 50mm while its main gun was as small as a 37 or 50mm weapon. Some vehicles carried a 75mm gun but this was designed for infantry support and was of the low velocity type. At that time successful for that role but until modified it was only good against tanks at close range. However, by 1944 armour thickness could be as much as 200mm with a 128mm main gun capable of shooting armour piercing rounds. The Strumtiger actually had a 380mm gun that fired a special projectile to destroy enemy fortifications.

But it wasn't mass and might alone that was evolving. Technology in making tanks that weighed nearly 70 tons maneuver and handle all sorts of terrain had to keep pace with the capability to deliver a deadly blow and to withstand one as well.

Perhaps the best example of this is the German's Königster. In English that would be King or Royal Tiger, but it is commonly known as the Tiger II, which was the largest, heaviest and most formidable tank to see combat during World War Two. The front armour was 150mm thick at 40º deflection that added to its protection against armour piercing rounds. The sides of the hull was 80mm thick as was the sides and back of the turret. The standard Henschel turret was 180mm thick in the front. This tank was certainly not indestructible but at times it was frustrating trying.


Two different American accounts record;

One day a Tiger II tank got within 150 yards of my tank and knocked me out. Five of our tanks opened up on him from ranges of 200 to 600 yards and got five or six hits on the front of the Tiger. They all just glanced off and the Tiger backed off and got away. If we had a tank like the Tiger, we would all be home today.

The second account reads;
Plainly visible at 2,500 yards was a Tiger II with its side exposed to us. It was dug in up to the hull on a ridge commanding two draws. Another force was attempting to advance toward this vehicle and the enemy tank would hit two of ours, and the forces would withdraw. This continued for a day and a half, until the "Kraut" ran out of ammunition and drove away. All during this time my platoon fired AP, smoke and HE, attempting to dislodge the enemy tank. We had at least 10 to 15 direct hits with 75mm AP on the tank, but he failed to move, and we made no apparent impression on the vehicles occupants.

Knocked out King Tiger at Normandy
As tough as the King Tiger was, this was the fate of most.


The 88mm 71 cal. gun on the Tiger II was more powerful than the 88mm 56 cal. gun on the Tiger I and had better velocity at 3,220 fps. This could penetrate 182mm of 30º armour at 500 yards. This was more than enough to deal with Russia's JS 2 tanks. On the western front, America never really fielded a true competitor until so late in the war that accounts are scarce. The Tiger II carried 84 rounds and they weighed 37 pounds each.

The beginnings of the Tiger II actually date back to August 1942 when specifications were issued for a modified Tiger I, incorporating the slopped armour of the revolutionary Russian T-34 design. As with the Panther, the Germans were tying to design steps ahead of their competition. Porsche and Henschel presented proposals for this new panzer and it appeared Porsche would get the nod to fill the production order but being that the copper needed for the electric transmission was scarce in Germany, affecting production time tables, Henschel took over. This was not so until Porsche had completed 50 turrets, that is why pictures show Tiger IIs with two different looking turrets. The Henschel design was better than the Porsche because the underside slop of the turret could deflect enemy rounds into the hull (This is called a shot trap), whereas Henschel's 180mm thick front armour of the turret would not. Compare the two below.

KING TIGER with Henschel turret KING TIGER with Porsche turret
King Tiger with the Henschel turret.
King Tiger with the Porsche turret.
50 of this type was the first produced.


LESSONS LEARNED


  1. STANDARDIZED
    1. An intentional delay in mass producing the Tiger II occurred in order to standardize parts with the latest models of the Panther tank, the Panther II, and the Tiger I. Some parts included were the cupolas, engines, engine covers and road wheels. This was helpful in parts being available for faster field repairs and production.

  2. OVERLAPPING
    1. Dropping the interleaved road wheels for an overlapping stylel. This simplified maintenance and repairs as well as reduced freeze-up between the road wheels from freezing mud.

  3. STEEL WHEELS
    1. These were used instead of the type with rubber around the rims. The steel wheels were more resilient and offered better cross country performance.

  4. ZIMMERIT
    1. This was an anti-magnetic paste added to the surface of the armour to deter enemy tank destroying troops using magnetic explosives.


DRAWBACKS


  1. UNDER POWERED
    1. In fact the engine driving this 68 tons of Tiger II was the same engine that was in the 45 ton Panther.

  2. ECONOMY
    1. Moving the weight of a tank this size required a large consumption of gas. At this stage in the war, this was a luxury that Germany just didn't have.

  3. BREAKDOWNS
    1. This was the result of being under powered. 68 tons of stress on the drive train led to many mechanical failures. These breakdowns and running out of fuel left many of these powerful tanks abandoned by their crews on the battlefield. In time the mechanical issues could have been alleviated to some degree but time was another luxury that Germany didn't have.


Even with it's drawbacks, the Tiger II was a great tank with many excellent design features. Surprisingly capable of greater maneuverability than some smaller allied tanks on certain terrain.

Fortunately, only 489 were built.



TIGER II



Specifications of the
KING TIGER

WEIGHT

68 Tons

CREW

5

ARMAMENT

88mm & 2 mg

ARMOUR

150mm

ENGINE

Maybach HL 230 P30
V-12 700hp

SPEED

26 MPH (42km/h)

RANGE

106 miles (170km)

LENGHT

33.79' (10.3m)

WIDTH

12.33' (3.76m)

HEIGHT

10.1' (3.08m)





HOME TOP BACK